Retro Review: Ben-Hur (1959)

In honor on the recent remake, I have decided to take a look back at the classic Ben-Hur. Is Ben-Hur a relic of films past that should be remade, or should it be held on its own still today? Even with slowdown and being long, Ben-Hur is an engrossing and important piece of film that should be remembered, not remade.

            Ben-Hur begins with Judah Ben-Hur, a Jewish merchant, reconnecting with his friend Messala, a Roman tribune, in 1 A.D. After a disagreement, and accidently injuring a general, Judah, his mother, and his sister, are thrown in prison. What follows is a quest for revenge and forgiveness, including slave rowing in the galleys (warships), participating in a life or death chariot race, and even meting Jesus Christ. The films plot is very engaging, especially at the chariot scene and the scenes of him as a slave in the galley. The film does experience some slowdown, such as before the chariot race. At 3 hours and 44 minutes, the film is long, but that is also including the intermission, the credits and a few other scenes.  

            All the actors play their respective parts well. Charlton Heston shines as Judah Ben-Hur, acting with the passion of a man who is out for revenge, yet is capable of showing emotions. Stephen Boyd portrays Messala well, as does Hugh Griffith as Sheik Ilderim. A special mention to Claude Heater for his portrayal of Jesus Christ, adding an effectiveness to the role by never speaking and showing his face, yet being crucial to the story.   

            For the late 1950’s, the effects are great. There were over 300 sets made to show all different locations of the time period. Even the use of miniatures during a naval battle (although noticeable), work for the film. The chariot sequence is the shining star of the film, with an amazing 12 minute sequence, pitting Judah against Messala and several others. The only complaint is choppy editing is some scenes throughout the film.

            Even though it has a long run time, Ben-Hur is worthy of a view and for taking a place in cinema history. Its story and characters shine on the screen. It engages the audience with its set pieces, even with certain editing faults.

Rating: 8.75/10